Wednesday, March 21, 2012

MAJORITY VOTES AGAINST COMPULSORY MARKETING LEVY 'SPECIAL RATE' RIP-OFF


Hopefully Council is listening to the massive protest vote of 330+ written submissions 
submitted by its deadline last Tuesday 20th. That's over 51% which is legally enough to stop this rate from proceeding.
This 'special rate' exploits the small business majority that can least afford it, and delivers $1.8m to the SMBA. 
It forces wholesalers, exporters, business-to-business professionals, and those far from the centre of the precinct to fund the retail promotions of the few.
It also mysteriously exempts certain lucky businesses in the heart of South Melbourne, for which no explanation is offered.
The scheme can never deliver fair, equitable, relevant and appropriate representation to each business that's forced to fund it. 
This compulsory district marketing levy is a flawed 1980s idea, and unnecessary in the face of the internet and our own marketing plans.
Participation should be voluntary, it's that simple.

Tuesday, March 20, 2012

COUNCILS OUT OF TOUCH

In South Australia, the local councils are trying to prevent people from recording or taping them. (http://www.news.com.au/councils-move-to-censor-meetings/story-e6frea83-1226305744168)

Why?
Maybe be it's because  - as a rule - local councillors refuse to answer requests in writing. They are focussed on avoiding any written evidence that could be used in FOI or otherwise hold them to account.
So they refuse to answer queries, and they certainly don't write anything down.

Here in the Victoria its the same. We write to them, they respond with a receipt email, and include no actual information that could constitute an answer.
If we insist on a reply, they phone back, avoiding written evidence of any kind.
Where's the proof of what they said?
No wonder people want to tape them.

How did Councils get so out of touch with their community? Seems they have completely forgotten their role is one of ADVOCACY and REPRESENTATION.


Monday, March 19, 2012

HOW TO FIGHT A "SPECIAL RATE"




Council's are levying special rates for everything from road sealing to bike paths to advertising.

This is ON TOP to normal collected rates.

People may or may not want the works or activities proposed by council, but the 'special' rate means the charge will be COMPULSORY.

Unless you know how to stop it. (SEE BELOW)

The rates are levied in this way usually because council has no funds to do the work, 
or feels it can out-source the cost of certain activities to a group with a 'perceived benefit'.
The benefit is often impossible to measure, and often comes down the the opinion of a council officer. Sometimes, all monies levied are handed over to a private association, like a trader's association, which is then not monitored by council very closely at all, and which also can claim 'commercial in confidence' when ratepayers ask to see the financial records, expenditure or other details of activities.

Example 1:  COMPULSORY PAVING of PARADISE: In a rural shire, even if a sealed road is unwanted by over 85% for residents in a peaceful beach-side back street,  council can force residents to pay $10K+ per household 'special rate' for kerb and channel, sealing and paths.Surely this should come from rates? And if no residents actually want the works, why does council insist of raisng money on top of rates to execute these works?


Example 2: COMPLUSLORY ADVERTISING LEVY: In a city shire, a local advertising campaign that lumps a business in with all kinds of irrelevant local connections can be a detriment for many, even completely irrelevant to many who are wholesalers, exporters, business-to-business operations, but if council says you'll benefit, there can be no argument.
Compulsorily levied, the 'special rate' can be then given to a non-transparent entity like a trader's assocation, committeed and controlled byjust 6 traders with a vested interest of  their own.
Levied $500 minimum per business - and all you get is a listing on a lame 'Council-sanctioned' website - a negative association for many businesses. Participation in street fairs requires a further spend of up to $600 for the stall alone, excluding staff, set-up, etc. This is effectively a hike in rates of $1000+ minimum per year. Unwanted, unmeasured, unnecessary, undemocratic. The bulk of the collected 'rate' goes to the committee who do as they please with it.



These schemes favour the self-interested, greedy few over the vast majority of stakeholders 
who are too confused, busy or ground-down by this sort of scheme/scam to defend themselves. The real benficiaries are the consultants to whom the projects are given, often known to those commissioning the works, and council officers or committee members employed in the scheme. 


How to stop a special rate.

1. You will need 51% of rated entities to object BEFORE the rate is declared by council. Act as soon as you get a 'proposal letter'.
2. Council will strike a short deadline for objections, making it almost impossible for you to succeed.
3. So request an extension to the deadline for objections asap. and keep requesting.
4. Create a flyer explaining the issue and the need for 51% objectors and the date for cut-off.
Explain that objections are useless unless there are 51%. Those who do not object will unwittingly make others pay. Add an objection slip, naming the scheme, notice of objection, facility for name, signature, date and importantly a 'reason why'. This last indiviualises each objection slip and therefore makes it NOT a petition.
5. Get/buy/borrow a realestate data base of all rate-payers/property owners/ businesses whichever is relevant and do a mass maildrop of your flyer and an objection slip.
6. Doorknock and explain, get objection slips signed and collect these. Councils will NOT tell you how many people have objected, citing 'privacy' laws, so you will need to keep your own tally.
7. Study the Local Govt Act, Section 163 (1) of 1989 and make sure the council and their agents have acted FULLY in accordance with the law.
8. Write letters to council objecting and include a request in your letter to be heard at the Council hearing which they will hold on the matter.

9. NOTE: once the scheme is "declared" as a special rate, it is out of Council's hands. They will be powerless to undo the declaration, by law.
They will abandon you and your complaints to VCAT.
By this stage, it's too late for you. Your only recourse is VCAT, which MUST rule on an obscure equation of works/proximity/vallue=benefit, and cannot really evaluate your individual situation. Few succeed here.
10. Tell as many other ratepayers in as many other shires as you can.

Council should be there to advocate for the ratepayers
Council should allow 3 months for objections, use plain English in their letters, and clearly explain the 51% mechanism for objections, which they do not do.





Friday, March 2, 2012

Email your objection to:


Council has advised it will accept emailed objections, so email your objection to:

dknight@portphillip.vic.gov.au,
rpowning@portphillip.vic.gov.au, 
foconnor@portphillip.vic.gov.au, 
jbolitho@portphillip.vic.gov.au, 
jtouzeau@portphillip.vic.gov.au, 
jmiddleton@portphillip.vic.gov.au,
 jklepner@portphillip.vic.gov.au, 
sthomann@portphillip.vic.gov.au

Thursday, March 1, 2012

UNFAIR, PLAIN AND SIMPLE

The thing about the way this rate is structured is, by not objecting, some businesses can force other businesses to pay. And if those other businesses are blocks and blocks away from any 'activities', they are paying for nothing.
That's just unfair.

We all need to object, and start again. This scheme should be OPT-IN.
Those who choose to collaborate can do so freely.
It just should not be compulsory.

We don't ask you to pay for our advertising, please don't ask us to pay for yours.

Object before the 20th.
Have your say or we all pay.