Saturday, June 13, 2020
Friday, December 14, 2012
SURPRISE SMBA AGM to be held on 28 DEC!!
TO BE HELD AT BELLS HOTEL, 7.30pm
157 MORAY STREET STH MELBOURNE
157 MORAY STREET STH MELBOURNE
Did you get the SMBA email invitation to this meeting?
Many traders did NOT get this email.
Did you know the SMBA was about to hold an AGM at the presidents new hotel?
Did you know the SMBA is about to hold an election at this meeting?
Did you know YOU can be a candidate?
They will vote a new comittee to make decisions including about taxing you.
Will you be included?
Do you think the timing is reasonable?
28 December is, for most, a holiday from business.
Is the timing deliberate?
Are we in for more of the same poor consultation from the SMBA in 2013?
Talk to your neighbours,
Stay informed.
Did you know the SMBA was about to hold an AGM at the presidents new hotel?
Did you know the SMBA is about to hold an election at this meeting?
Did you know YOU can be a candidate?
They will vote a new comittee to make decisions including about taxing you.
Will you be included?
Do you think the timing is reasonable?
28 December is, for most, a holiday from business.
Is the timing deliberate?
Doesn't the SMBA want any of the local traders to be there?.
They have scheduled the AGM for the 28th of December, just 2 days before New Years,
when most people will be away having a hard earned break.
They would know very well that these days between Christmas and New Year
are often the only break many get.
Talk to your neighbours,
Stay informed.
Let them know the timing is appalling, they are not serving your needs, and tell the Council too!
Here are the NEW councillor's contact details:
LOCAL WARD COUNCILLOR: Anita Horvath: ahorvath@portphillip.vic.gov.au
MAYOR: Amanda Stevens : mayor@portphillip.vic.gov.au or astevens@portphillip.vic.gov.au
Tuesday, September 11, 2012
SMBA & Council debate abandonment of scheme
It would seem that council (COPP) and the SMBA have finally realised they are not in sync with the local business community's needs and wishes and plan to abandon their special rate scheme.
Council's website lists their options as abandoning the special rate, or trying again later. (See agenda at: http://www.portphillip.vic.gov.au/Report_15_South_Melb_Special_Rate.pdf)
Trying again later will encourage the same reaction from the local businesses who are forced to fund the rate, so let's hope that sanity prevails and they abandon the scheme.
Meanwhile, what fate for the self-appointed SMBA? They are non-representative and non-transparent spenders of millions of dollars of community rates. What a junket!
Let's hope it over, and we can get on with the business of running and promoting our businesses and the local area in ways that are measurable, relevant and controlled by business owners who pay.
Well done and thanks to all who stood up for their rights to have a say about how they spend their own marketing dollars.
Stay in touch at www.concernedsthmelb.com
Council's website lists their options as abandoning the special rate, or trying again later. (See agenda at: http://www.portphillip.vic.gov.au/Report_15_South_Melb_Special_Rate.pdf)
Trying again later will encourage the same reaction from the local businesses who are forced to fund the rate, so let's hope that sanity prevails and they abandon the scheme.
Meanwhile, what fate for the self-appointed SMBA? They are non-representative and non-transparent spenders of millions of dollars of community rates. What a junket!
Let's hope it over, and we can get on with the business of running and promoting our businesses and the local area in ways that are measurable, relevant and controlled by business owners who pay.
Well done and thanks to all who stood up for their rights to have a say about how they spend their own marketing dollars.
Stay in touch at www.concernedsthmelb.com
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
FORUM = FARCE, FIREWORKS, FIASCO!
City of Port Phillip, SMBA and Cr Frank O'Connor had obviously planned a multi-coloured spin session for the Forum, packed with powerpoints and consultants.
What was actually required was an opportunity for the community to finally be allowed to put their questions and for the SMBA to be answerable for their past activities.
What we got was self-serving spin from the SMBA, self-promotion from expensive consultants, legal basics from council's lawyers, and pro-SMBA bias from Council officers, all delivered with a patronising arrogance that beggars belief. (Especially when the community is actually better informed about the process, the requirements, the legal issues, the flaws, the history, the politics and the status quo than the SMBA.)
As there was no facility for the community to speak (other than a 20min question session relegated to the end of the 3 hour night), an impatient crowd had soon had enough, and the meeting quickly descended into comments from the floor. Forced to abandon their script, the SMBA and Cr O'Connor set their expensive consultants aside and attempted to field angry questions from the community.
80+ people showed up, and in a show of hands over 80% of these VOTED AGAINST this useless, ineffective, unmeasurable, undemocratic Special Rate Advertising Levy. (This number would have been higher had Cr O'Connor allowed the request for a vote to occur when it was originally called for, and before many attendees had left in disgust after over 3 hours.)
So much for democracy.
Cr O'Connor advised that despite the overwhelming opposition, he would still accept a request to proceed and would consider restarting the Special Rate if asked to do so by just 8 people of the SMBA.
There are many questions that were not asked, because there was no time or facility for the public to ask them. How will Council ever be fully informed of the REAL issues if it insists on making no time for REAL consultation.
There should be another Forum held, this time one that the community can be properly heard at, instead of being forced to call questions from the floor. How about adding us into the top of the Agenda?
That would be REAL democracy.
What was actually required was an opportunity for the community to finally be allowed to put their questions and for the SMBA to be answerable for their past activities.
What we got was self-serving spin from the SMBA, self-promotion from expensive consultants, legal basics from council's lawyers, and pro-SMBA bias from Council officers, all delivered with a patronising arrogance that beggars belief. (Especially when the community is actually better informed about the process, the requirements, the legal issues, the flaws, the history, the politics and the status quo than the SMBA.)
As there was no facility for the community to speak (other than a 20min question session relegated to the end of the 3 hour night), an impatient crowd had soon had enough, and the meeting quickly descended into comments from the floor. Forced to abandon their script, the SMBA and Cr O'Connor set their expensive consultants aside and attempted to field angry questions from the community.
80+ people showed up, and in a show of hands over 80% of these VOTED AGAINST this useless, ineffective, unmeasurable, undemocratic Special Rate Advertising Levy. (This number would have been higher had Cr O'Connor allowed the request for a vote to occur when it was originally called for, and before many attendees had left in disgust after over 3 hours.)
So much for democracy.
Cr O'Connor advised that despite the overwhelming opposition, he would still accept a request to proceed and would consider restarting the Special Rate if asked to do so by just 8 people of the SMBA.
There are many questions that were not asked, because there was no time or facility for the public to ask them. How will Council ever be fully informed of the REAL issues if it insists on making no time for REAL consultation.
There should be another Forum held, this time one that the community can be properly heard at, instead of being forced to call questions from the floor. How about adding us into the top of the Agenda?
That would be REAL democracy.
Thursday, May 24, 2012
SMBA/COPP FORUM or FARCE?
Despite letters and emails since February, and formal Questions asked at Council meeting,
the City of Port Phillip has refused to answer questions raised by the community.
Come along to the Forum on Wed 6 June, 6pm South Melbourne Commons cnr Bank/Montague Streets and bring your own questions.........
•What do YOU get for this rate? How does anyone benefit when all the activities happen outside a few businesses in and near Coventry Street - many of which are the businesses owned by the SMBA committee of 6 traders.
•If the SMBA benefits South Melbourne, why is the Market exempt? As the Council owns the Market, isn't this a conflict of interest?
•Why is 'retailers tax' - being levied on non-retail businesses?
•How could business-to-business, professionals, exporters, wholesalers and so on EVER gain any benefit from the SMBA's activities?
•Why is the Special Rate Advertising Levy NOT applied to all local business addresses inside the Council-designated boundary?
•Why are some lucky properties exempt? Is this incompetence? or favouritism?
•Why does the SMBA not have a correct address database?
•Will the president of the SMBA be at the Forum and answerable for the past expenditure of rate payers funds?
•Did the research report clearly recommend against The Block promotion? Did the SMBA president sign the deal anyway? Did the research report cost $10,000?
•Are the committee members resigning? Why does the President want a short 'retirement' from the role at this particular time?
•Who will be answerable at the Forum?
•Why is it that the SMBA can do anonymous polls, token research and blanket mailouts to unaddressed recipients, yet local objectors are forced to produce statutory declarations to prove they have a right to a voice?
•Why are the past financial records not being tabled by the SMBA?
•Who are the suppliers that have been gaining the contracts from the SMBA courtesy of ratepayers funds?
•Why are there 4 different Council-created lists of the rateable addresses? and which is the actual one? Is your property IN or OUT of the rated area? How can you find out?
•Shouldn't Council be asking these questions?
• When the community is desperately asking for help and good governance from it's local representatives, why do they seem so reluctant to be informed about the facts?
•Why are Councillor Frank O'Connor and Mayor Powning so determined not to answer these questions?
•Will the SMBA finally have a Business Plan? Was this commissioned just these last weeks, and how much did the SMBA pay to consultants to create it?
• If the SMBA wants $1.8 million of our money, shouldn't Council have demanded a Business Plan FIRST not last and only after community pressure?
• Why do these unhelpful Councillors deserve our votes?
There is an election coming up soon. Remember when you vote, that Frank O'Connor wants this levy to happen.
This is where the SMBA has hidden the meeting:
South Melbourne Commons - located at the Corner of Banks and Montague Streets,
MEL REF 2K A3.....possibly in the cafe or in the hall out the back?
No agenda has been provided, despite numerous requests.
Will it be just a spin session by the SMBA?
Hope to see you all there.
the City of Port Phillip has refused to answer questions raised by the community.
Come along to the Forum on Wed 6 June, 6pm South Melbourne Commons cnr Bank/Montague Streets and bring your own questions.........
•What do YOU get for this rate? How does anyone benefit when all the activities happen outside a few businesses in and near Coventry Street - many of which are the businesses owned by the SMBA committee of 6 traders.
•If the SMBA benefits South Melbourne, why is the Market exempt? As the Council owns the Market, isn't this a conflict of interest?
•Why is 'retailers tax' - being levied on non-retail businesses?
•How could business-to-business, professionals, exporters, wholesalers and so on EVER gain any benefit from the SMBA's activities?
•Why is the Special Rate Advertising Levy NOT applied to all local business addresses inside the Council-designated boundary?
•Why are some lucky properties exempt? Is this incompetence? or favouritism?
•Why does the SMBA not have a correct address database?
•Will the president of the SMBA be at the Forum and answerable for the past expenditure of rate payers funds?
•Did the research report clearly recommend against The Block promotion? Did the SMBA president sign the deal anyway? Did the research report cost $10,000?
•Are the committee members resigning? Why does the President want a short 'retirement' from the role at this particular time?
•Who will be answerable at the Forum?
•Why is it that the SMBA can do anonymous polls, token research and blanket mailouts to unaddressed recipients, yet local objectors are forced to produce statutory declarations to prove they have a right to a voice?
•Why are the past financial records not being tabled by the SMBA?
•Who are the suppliers that have been gaining the contracts from the SMBA courtesy of ratepayers funds?
•Why are there 4 different Council-created lists of the rateable addresses? and which is the actual one? Is your property IN or OUT of the rated area? How can you find out?
•Shouldn't Council be asking these questions?
• When the community is desperately asking for help and good governance from it's local representatives, why do they seem so reluctant to be informed about the facts?
•Why are Councillor Frank O'Connor and Mayor Powning so determined not to answer these questions?
•Will the SMBA finally have a Business Plan? Was this commissioned just these last weeks, and how much did the SMBA pay to consultants to create it?
• If the SMBA wants $1.8 million of our money, shouldn't Council have demanded a Business Plan FIRST not last and only after community pressure?
• Why do these unhelpful Councillors deserve our votes?
There is an election coming up soon. Remember when you vote, that Frank O'Connor wants this levy to happen.
This is where the SMBA has hidden the meeting:
South Melbourne Commons - located at the Corner of Banks and Montague Streets,
MEL REF 2K A3.....possibly in the cafe or in the hall out the back?
No agenda has been provided, despite numerous requests.
Will it be just a spin session by the SMBA?
Hope to see you all there.
Friday, May 18, 2012
COUNCIL ANNOUNCES FORUM 6 JUNE
After the recent overwhelming community Protest Vote against the SMBA’s special rate and the objections put to Council on 24/4/12, the City of Port Phillip Council has
directed the SMBA to ‘pause’ the process and hold a community ‘Forum’.
Council has advised the FORUM will be held by the SMBA
on Wed June 6, (time yet to be announced).
At this Forum, the SMBA will be required to explain why they want your $1.8 million
for the Advertising Levy Special Rate, and exactly what they will do with it.
This will be YOUR chance to ask questions directly of the SMBA
and ask how - if at all - this advertising levy will benefit YOU.
•The SMBA had NO Business Plan when they petitioned Council for this rate in November 2011. It STILL has NO business plan but is required to reveal its plan at this Forum.
• Why are some central South Melbourne addresses (e.g.some York Street) excluded from this rate? Is this incompetence? or favouritism?
•Why are businesses from the Market exempt from this rate?
• Why won’t the SMBA provide their past Financial statements to YOU the members?
(YOU are a member if you are paying this rate.)
• Where has the past rate money been spent, with what businesses, at whose choice and for how much?
• How much has been spent on The Block promotion? Did the SMBA commission a report that actually recommended AGAINST the Block promotion?
• What are the ructions in the committee – are committee members resigning? Is the President ‘retiring’? Why?
•Why have Council and the SMBA refused to provide answers to many questions like these from the community?
There are lots more questions the SMBA should be forced to answer.
Remember, it is the majority who do NOT agree with this rate.
Bring your questions and be ready to come along to the SMBA's Forum
WED JUNE 6th and put your own questions to them.
What do YOU get for your money, and WHO decides that?
Please ask your neighbours if they are plugged into this information loop, and if not, plug them in. They can send their email addresses to: http://www.concernedsthmelb.com/
Wednesday, April 25, 2012
COUNCIL MEETING PROTEST STALLS SPECIAL RATE
We put our Protest case to Council on Tuesday night's City of Port Phillip Council meeting.
Congratulations to all the Speakers against the SMBA's special rate scheme - well done!
Although the process was again truncated (Questions were moved to Comment time, and then speakers were limited to a ridiculous 3 mins, effectively meaning Questions were NOT allowed in the time, and speakers could NOT put all their points.)
RESULTS:
The Protest point was made and Council has undertaken to do something.
Councillors suggest:
1. A 'Pause' on the striking of the rate ( NOTE: if they decide to eventually go ahead it could well be implemented retrospectively).
2. A 'Forum' so all involved can have a fair say about this rate.
Council advised they would not run this Forum, that SMBA should set it up, and it be independently moderated. (Who is that independent moderator???).
This begs the question AGAIN, who will be invited? because seeing as Council and SMBA DO NOT have a correct database, how will we know everyone has been contacted?
3. Council will then review the results of this forum and decide whether to "modify, reduce, expand or abandon" the scheme.
HOWEVER, the councillor who suggested this - Cr Frank O'Connor, stated adamantly that although he thought this review was now required in the light of our protests, that he was totally IN FAVOUR of the special rate and thought it should go ahead.
The Councillor who seconded this motion - Cr Serge Thomann, stated he also wanted the special rate to happen. So no objectivity there.
4. After the Forum is held, the Council proposed to POSSIBLY re-advertise the rate and start again, meaning we would all have the chance to vote again.
5.This is not certain however. If they try to modify the scheme and we are still not happy, remember we have OVER 300 signed objections.
ALSO Remember this - NOT ONE OF YOUR OBJECTIONS was included in the 'Consideration of Submissions Report to Council, Report 4'.
Not one.
They distorted the evidence, cut short our speaking time, many many points critical were not even put and ALL our questions remain unanswered.
A very diminished democracy indeed.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)